Anwar peliwat ?- Komen Tun Dr Mahathir

Anwar peliwat ?- Komen Tun Dr Mahathir

Saya tidak hendak komen berkenaan dengan kes liwat oleh Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim yang baru kerana saya ingin lihat samada taktik Anwar kali ini sama dengan dahulu - iaitu menuduh ada konspirasi (pakatan) untuk menghalang perjuangan politiknya.

Tetapi oleh kerana ramai yang meminta komen saya dalam blog maka saya akan beri pandangan awal saya.


Saya terkejut dengan orang yang pertama menyuarakan pandangan yang tak masuk akal berkenaan dengan kes liwat yang baru ini. Kononnya Anwar sengaja menyuruh Saiful buat laporan dia diliwat oleh bossnya supaya Anwar boleh cari perlindungan daripada percubaan membunuhnya. Dengan itu kononnya orang ramai akan bersimpati dengannya.

Jelas yang budak yang di suruh oleh bapa mertuanya hantar passport kepada Anwar, yang amat gembira dengan pembebasan Anwar dan dipercayai terlibat dengan usaha membebaskan Anwar, masih kuat kepercayaannya kepada Anwar dan mencuba menolak tuduhan terhadapnya.




Masih ramai yang percaya bahawa Mahkamah Rayuan (Appeals Court) terakhir telah menolak tuduhan bahawa Anwar telah liwat Azizan dan dengan kerana itu mendapati Anwar tidak bersalah dan boleh dibebaskan.

Saya ingin perturunkan disini keputusan dua daripada tiga hakim yang mendengar rayuan Anwar. "Tun Jebat" pada 1hb Julai telah catatkan keputusan ini juga. Keputusan ini berbunyi;

"Even though reading the appeal record, we find EVIDENCE TO CONFIRM that the appellants (Anwar dan Sukma) were involved in homosexual activities and we are more inclined to believe that the alleged incident at Tivoli Villa did happen sometime, this court, as a court of law, may only convict the appellants if the prosecution has successfully proved that the alleged offences as stated in the charge, beyond reasonable doubt".

Yang jelas daripada apa yang di sebut di atas ialah hakim-hakim ini mendapati ada cukup bukti yang mengesahkan Anwar dan Sukma terlibat dalam kegiatan homoseks dalam apa yang dikatakan berlaku di Tivoli Villa, memang berlaku. Tetapi kedua-dua hakim ini mengguna selok-belok undang-undang untuk mendapati Anwar tidak bersalah.

Selok-belok undang-undang tidak dapat difahami oleh orang ramai. Yang mereka tahu ialah hakim-hakim ini berkata dengan terang dan jelas bahawa mereka mendapati bukti yang jelas yang mengesahkan bahawa perayu (Anwar dan Sukma) terlibat dengan kegiatan homoseks dan hakim-hakim ini lebih mirip untuk percaya bahawa apa yang didakwa berlaku di Tivoli Villa memang berlaku.

Hakim yang ketiga dalam panel hakim yang mendengar rayuan Anwar dan Sukma memberi alasan yang panjang dan penuh dengan rujukan kepada asas-asas perundangan dan kes-kes yang lain kenapa dia percaya hukuman yang dijatuhkan oleh hakim bicara, tiga orang hakim Mahkamah Rayuan dan tiga orang hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan adalah betul iaitu Anwar memang meliwat Azizan.

Malangnya penghakiman yang bernas ini tidak dilapor dengan jelas oleh media seperti laporan berkenaan asas-asas penghakiman dua hakim tadi.

Jika dihitung kita akan dapati kesemua 10 hakim yang mendengar kes Anwar meliwat Azizan bersetuju perbuatan liwat oleh Anwar memang benar, walaupun dua di antara mereka memberi alasan teknikal untuk tidak menjatuhkan hukuman salah keatasnya.

Dakwaan oleh orang tertentu bahawa pembebasan Anwar adalah kerana dia tidak melakukan jenayah liwat adalah tidak benar.

Sekarang kita dengar sekali lagi kes liwat oleh Anwar. Terpulanglah kepada hakim untuk mendengar dan meghukum. Awal-awal lagi Datin Seri Wan Azizah Ismail telah mengatakan ketidakpercayaannya kepada mahkamah di Malaysia. Tetapi apabila Anwar dibebaskan dengan alasan yang sukar difaham oleh masyarakat umum, Wan Azizah tidak pula berkata yang dianya tidak percaya kepada sistem pengadilan di Malaysia.

Apakah pula akan dikatakan olehnya jika perbicaraan kes Anwar menghasilkan keputusan bahawa walaupun hakim percaya dia telah meliwat Saiful tetapi kerana selok-belok undang-undang dia didapati tidak bersalah.

artikel asal : chedet.com


Snippets - Anwar

Posted by Dr. Mahathir Mohamad at July 5, 2008 11:04 AM

Some say let bygone be bygone. As good Muslims we should forget and forgive.

It is easy to say this if you are not the subject of Anwar's plotting and vengeance.

Anwar has succeeded in blackening my name in the United States and Europe of course, but also in Muslim countries. They all think I simply threw him in prison for political reasons.

He never said anything about how he was tried, how he was defended by nine lawyers, how the judge wrote a 360-page judgement against him, how his appeals were thrown out twice.

He has sued me for RM100 million. He has successfully caused my lawyer to lose credibility. Now I have no lawyer to defend me against his suit. I still have this suit against me. There is no certainty that some legal arguments by judges may not end up in finding me guilty of publicly saying he was guilty of sodomy even though that is the truth.

Anwar obtained the recording of Linggam's telephone conversation obviously for blackmailing purpose. The man responsible is in his party now.

He made out that he was interested in the proper appointment of judges but actually his action was in order to seek revenge against me.

Now the Royal Commission has named me as one of those to be investigated although I had nothing to do with Linggam and his activities. I only came to know Linggam because he was successful in some litigation cases. So I decided to take him as my lawyer in the case by Anwar.

But the Royal Commission concluded that if it is possible that I was involved then I must be involved. It is almost like saying if it is possible I had murdered a person then I must have murdered the person. Proof beyond reasonable doubt is not necessary here.

The Anti-Corruption Agency has interrogated me for three-hours. I am sure I will be questioned in court also because of a possibility that I was lobbied on the appointment of judges.

I am aware of efforts to find if I had committed offences during my 22 years as Prime Minister. So far they haven't found anything. But now they have found an indirect way of getting at me.

I am not seeking sympathy from anyone. But it is a little bit too much to expect me to forget and forgive something that is happening now as a result of Anwar's plottings.

Now he has turned his attention to Dato Seri Najib. As usual he has found someone to make incriminating statements for him.

There seems to be no connection between his plotting against me and his attack against Dato Seri Najib. But if we look into who would be the beneficiary, we would see the connection.

Like Ian Chin, helping the present powers that be is a form of defence.

baca artikel asal : chedet.com