MODERATOR AIDC

AIDC NORA ZEK LADY
FAIZAL OM 300 QASEH
UDIN KMBG GLORY CKIAH
DRASEREMANG PISAU ABU

PANAS! DI AIDC GROUP

Anwar, International Crisis Group & Annapolis Summit : Klik di sini


NOTIS

Sesiapa yang mempunyai salinan pita rakaman mesyuarat MT berkenaan pemecatan Anwar pada tahun 1998, diharap dapat menghubungi saya via ym aidceditor atau email aidceditor@yahoo.com

28 Jul 2009

Ean Yong making own invoices for claim to State govt



By t4tbh


Wong Chun How has said that many of the projects listed are not existing. This means Ean Yong have simply used Wong's name for claiming money without even telling him. There are so many projects that even Wong don't know from where it comes. That is why Wong said some of the projects are false. Wong is correct. Even Wong has been played out.



Then there is the case where Ean Yong Hian Wah just asked Teoh Beng Hock to make the invoices. This is illegal. Working with the contractors who want the job, Ean Yong just asked Teoh to make invoices with agreed amounts. So Teoh make the invoice, Ean Yong approve the project and the money is paid. Sometimes the project is not existent (like Wong has said) or just a portion is finished.

Here are four invoices manufactured by Teoh Beng Hock for Ean Yong Hian Wah:

1. MKMN Enterprise (Projek memasang tiang besi untuk pagar di Taman Serdang) for RM11,940.00

2. Syarikat Aris (Membina lantai konkrit untuk tempat tong sampah Kampung Air Panas, Kerling) for RM9,095.00

3. Fizami Construction (pagar dan longkang Pasar Rasa) for RM12,190.00

4. MA Bina Melor Enterprise (pagar di Taman Serdang Perdana) for RM19,513.00










Note that these invoices don't have signature. This is because they are from Teoh's computer disk. This is illegal. Why does Teoh have unsigned invoices stored in his computer memory? There are names and telephone numbers provided, in this case bumi contractors. For sure handphone sudah mati, cannot be located or address do not exist.

Please note that two contracts are given for 'projek memasang tiang besi untuk pagar di Taman Serdang' - one to MKMN Ent. ($11,940) and another one to MA Bina Melor Ent. ($19,513). Two different projects or just two different invoices but for the same Taman? Just make the invoice to siphon out the money.

Why keep the invoice inside Teoh's computer? Very strange.

sumber - t4tbh


5 ulasan:

Shah berkata...

They are worst than BN, worst than conman working stealing money for their own pocket. Day light robbery. They deserve to be punished

Shah berkata...

They are worst than BN, worst than conman working stealing money for their own pocket. Day light robbery. They deserve to be punished

wénkt berkata...

btw, tiang besi dan pagar tu wujud tak?

kalau wujud, at least RM11k je hilang. kalau tak wujud, rm22k lah.

Godisuno berkata...

simple answer,
because the invoice is just a dummy to blind the eyes of auditor. It is highly possible that even the projects do not exist. the invoice s are used to cover up the "robbery".

ladybird berkata...

Lagi bagus kalau boleh check the project....wujud ke tidak?